So this week my topic is The Lord Often Taught With Parables, and I have a set of questions to answer for the assignment. But first, let's talk about why. Why did He talk in parables when He could have just come right out and say what He meant? In one of my communications classes - the only one I ever took, actually - our instructor would always say "say what you mean, mean what you say." Great advice, especially for someone (like me) who doesn't like to say much of anything concerning feelings and emotions. My poor husband can attest. It was a rough first year of marriage gaining some ground on communication ;) He still brings us the time I locked myself in the bathroom because I didn't want to talk at all. I didn't grow up expressing my feelings, and I had no idea how to do it. It still takes me a while sometimes to even process how I'm feeling and why. And as for the "mean what you say" part... Well, I think most of us would agree that when a woman says she's "fine", she's not fine.
So why can't I just talk in parables and similes and metaphors or even through actions - such as locking myself in a bathroom?? Why am I expected to come out and say exactly how I feel?? Easy answer: I'm not Christ. The other answer is that a marriage or close relationships are completely different than Christ teaching and instructing. If Christ had said exactly what He meant the scriptures would be at least twice as long! He meant many things so He simply told a short story that covered those many meanings. We all interpret the scriptures a little bit differently, and even personally we interpret them differently at different times. Why use many words when you can say so much with just a few?
Another reason for this way of communication is given right in between the parables. In Matthew 13:10-11 it says, "Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given." We only understand the parables as much as we are willing to. If we don't put for the effort to see and hear the meanings we simply won't understand them, and then our understanding in halted. Line upon line. Precept upon precept.
The other thing I wanted to mention that I thought was interesting was the relationship between the word "parable" coming from the word "parabola." Just in case it has been about 10 years since you've taken a geometry class - like me - here is a picture:
Last week in my history class we studied the long journey and the monomyth. They explained this by using a picture kind of like this. Theirs was better, but I couldn't find it. Anyway, during this journey or story (parable) imagine you start at one of the arrow points in the "known" world. We cross over the x-axis (time) into the "unknown" world and go through this process of learning and becoming. We follow the parabola back into the known world and have brought back with us some kind of knowledge. I just thought it was interesting to apply this parabolic journey into the idea of the parables of Christ as well.
Okay, onto the questions and their corresponding parables...
What describes the future growth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and how do you explain the remarkable growth of the Church considering it is fairly new compared to most world religions and started in the small American frontier?
I had never really thought about how very new this church is in relation to Islam or Catholicism and others. And it has grown quite large very quickly. I've heard it and said it many times before: The Gospel is perfect, the Church is not. And I do believe that. But we must be doing something right! We can compare this growth to the parable of the mustard seed (Matthew 13:31-32). It started with one boy and one question. So small. The mustard seed is "the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree."
Why does the Church send out so many missionaries?
We believe that it is our responsibility to gather others into the Gospel. We can compare this to the parable of the net found in Matthew 13:47-50. "The kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind."
Why are some members of the Church willing to sacrifice so much worldly wealth and recognition in order to maintain membership in the Church?
A pearl of great price (Matthew 13:45-46). Those that see the Church as this pearl with great value are willing to give up everything else to obtain it. The merchant man "went and sold all that he had, and bought it."
Why so some members leave the Church?
This is where our roots come in. I love Elder Nelson's talk about religion, Let Your Faith Show. "Religion" comes from the word "ligate" which means to tie back to. Religion provides the means to tie us back to Christ. Are we tied to Christ through our religion or are we simply tied to the Church? There are many reasons why people leave the Church, and I'm definitely not going to delve into them right now. It's lunch time, and I'm hungry ;) But if we don't accept the Church as simply a means for tying us to Christ and the fullness of His Gospel then I can definitely see how easy it would be to leave the Church and all its Mormon culture. We have to find root in Christ in order to survive this culture sometimes.
Let's look at Matthew 13:3-8, the parable of the seeds. "Behold, a sower went forth to sow; And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. And some fell among thorns; and the throne sprung up, and choked them: But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit." Whether we are in or out of the LDS Church, we must find root in Christ if we expect to grow instead of wither away.
There is happiness in the Gospel, which means we can find happiness in the Church. We just have to be willing to look past the "known" sometimes and feast upon the "unknown."

No comments:
Post a Comment